Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Counties
  • County : Ashland Census Tracts
  • County : Ashland Zip Codes
  • County : Ashtabula Census Tracts
  • County : Ashtabula Zip Codes
  • County : Cuyahoga Census Tracts
  • County : Cuyahoga Zip Codes
  • County : Geauga Census Tracts
  • County : Geauga Zip Codes
  • County : Lake Census Tracts
  • County : Lake Zip Codes
  • County : Lorain Census Tracts
  • County : Lorain Zip Codes
  • County : Medina Census Tracts
  • County : Medina Zip Codes
  • County : Portage Census Tracts
  • County : Portage Zip Codes
  • County : Summit Census Tracts
  • County : Summit Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population

Data updated 2/11/2024
Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population

Data updated 2/11/2024
Value
Compared to:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population State: Ohio

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population State: Ohio

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Ohio has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ohio (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ohio value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Ashland

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Ashland has a value of 7.0%.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Ashland has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (7.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Geauga

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Geauga has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Geauga has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Lake

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Lake has a value of 7.0%.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Lake has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Lorain

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Lorain has a value of 7.0%.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Lorain has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Medina

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Medina has a value of 7.0%.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Medina has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Portage

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Portage has a value of 7.0%.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Portage has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Tobacco Use: Medicare Population County: Summit

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (7.0%), Summit has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Summit has a value of 8.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Obesity: Medicare Population

Data updated 2/11/2024
Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

Obesity: Medicare Population

Data updated 2/11/2024
Value
Compared to:

Obesity: Medicare Population State: Ohio

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population State: Ohio

24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Ohio has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ohio (24.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ohio value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Ashland

31.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 31.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Ashland has a value of 31.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Ashland has a value of 31.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (31.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 26.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (26.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 24.0%.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (24.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.0%).
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Geauga

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Geauga has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Geauga has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (23.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Lake

21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Lake has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Lake has a value of 21.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (21.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Lorain

30.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 30.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Lorain has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Lorain has a value of 30.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (30.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Medina

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 26.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Medina has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Medina has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (26.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Portage

29.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 29.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Portage has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Portage has a value of 29.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (29.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Obesity: Medicare Population County: Summit

25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 25.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to the OH Value (24.0%), Summit has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Summit has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (25.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Ashland

49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Ashland has a value of 49.0%.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Ashland has a value of 49.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (49.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (51.0%).
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

47.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 47.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 47.0% which is lower and worse.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 47.0%.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (47.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (46.0%).
Prior Value
(46.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (50.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Geauga

50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Geauga has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Geauga has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (50.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (52.0%).
Prior Value
(52.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Lake

50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Lake has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Lake has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (50.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Lorain

52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Lorain has a value of 52.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Lorain has a value of 52.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (52.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (51.0%).
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Medina

50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Medina has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Medina has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (50.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (52.0%).
Prior Value
(52.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Portage

46.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 46.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Portage has a value of 46.0% which is lower and worse.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Portage has a value of 46.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (46.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (48.0%).
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Summit

49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (49.0%), Summit has a value of 49.0%.
OH Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Summit has a value of 49.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (49.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population State: Ohio

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population State: Ohio

49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Ohio has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of states. States in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while states in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.0%.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Ohio has a value of 49.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ohio (49.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.0%).
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ohio value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Ashland

3,164.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 3,164.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 3,164.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Ashland has a value of 3,164.0 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Ashland has a value of 3,164.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (3,164.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2,927.0).
Prior Value
(2,927.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

3,784.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 3,784.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 3,784.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Ashtabula has a value of 3,784.0 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Ashtabula has a value of 3,784.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (3,784.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (4,339.0).
Prior Value
(4,339.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

3,555.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 3,555.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 3,555.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Cuyahoga has a value of 3,555.0 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Cuyahoga has a value of 3,555.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (3,555.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,793.0).
Prior Value
(3,793.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Geauga

2,605.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 2,605.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 2,605.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Geauga has a value of 2,605.0 which is lower and better.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Geauga has a value of 2,605.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (2,605.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2,537.0).
Prior Value
(2,537.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Lake

3,152.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 3,152.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 3,152.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Lake has a value of 3,152.0 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Lake has a value of 3,152.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (3,152.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,200.0).
Prior Value
(3,200.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Lorain

3,469.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 3,469.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 3,469.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Lorain has a value of 3,469.0 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Lorain has a value of 3,469.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (3,469.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,677.0).
Prior Value
(3,677.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Medina

2,529.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 2,529.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 2,529.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Medina has a value of 2,529.0 which is lower and better.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Medina has a value of 2,529.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (2,529.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,600.0).
Prior Value
(2,600.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Portage

2,583.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 2,583.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 2,583.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Portage has a value of 2,583.0 which is lower and better.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Portage has a value of 2,583.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (2,583.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,618.0).
Prior Value
(2,618.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Summit

2,731.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 2,731.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,906.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,321.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 2,731.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (3,044.0), Summit has a value of 2,731.0 which is lower and better.
OH Value
(3,044.0)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Summit has a value of 2,731.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (2,731.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,032.0).
Prior Value
(3,032.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population State: Ohio

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population State: Ohio

3,044.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. States, Ohio has a value of 3,044.0 which is in the worst 25% of states. States in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,617.0 while states in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,014.0.
U.S. States
The distribution is based on data from 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Ohio has a value of 3,044.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ohio (3,044.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,113.0).
Prior Value
(3,113.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ohio value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Stroke: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Stroke: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Portage

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Portage has a value of 5.0%.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Portage has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Summit

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Summit has a value of 5.0%.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Summit has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (5.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Ashland

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Ashland has a value of 5.0%.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Ashland has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (5.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (6.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Geauga

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Geauga has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Geauga has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Lake

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Lake has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Lake has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Lorain

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Lorain has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Lorain has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Medina

6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (5.0%), Medina has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Medina has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Ashland

35.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 35.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 35.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Ashland has a value of 35.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Ashland has a value of 35.0%.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (35.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 36.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 36.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 36.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 36.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (36.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 37.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 37.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 37.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (37.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Geauga

38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 38.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 38.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Geauga has a value of 38.0%.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Geauga has a value of 38.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (38.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.0%).
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Lake

40.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 40.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Lake has a value of 40.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Lake has a value of 40.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (40.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Lorain

41.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 41.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 41.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Lorain has a value of 41.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Lorain has a value of 41.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (41.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (39.0%).
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Medina

38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 38.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 38.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Medina has a value of 38.0%.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Medina has a value of 38.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (38.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.0%).
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Portage

37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 37.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 37.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Portage has a value of 37.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Portage has a value of 37.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (37.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Summit

39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 39.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (38.0%), Summit has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Summit has a value of 39.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (39.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Ashland

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Ashland has a value of 8.0%.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Ashland has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 8.0%.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (8.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 10.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 10.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (10.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Geauga

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Geauga has a value of 10.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Geauga has a value of 10.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (10.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Lake

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Lake has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Lake has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (7.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Lorain

9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Lorain has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Lorain has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (9.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Medina

9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Medina has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Medina has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (9.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Portage

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Portage has a value of 10.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Portage has a value of 10.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (10.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Summit

9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (8.0%), Summit has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Summit has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (9.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Ashland

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Ashland has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Ashland has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (12.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Geauga

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Geauga has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Geauga has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (12.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Lake

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Lorain

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Lorain has a value of 11.0%.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lorain has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Medina

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Medina has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Medina has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Portage

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Portage has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Portage has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Summit

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (11.0%), Summit has a value of 11.0%.
OH Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Summit has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (11.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Lake

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Lake has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Lake has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Lorain

25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 25.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 25.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Lorain has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Lorain has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (25.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Medina

20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Medina has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Medina has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (20.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.0%).
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Portage

22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 22.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 22.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Portage has a value of 22.0%.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Portage has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (22.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Summit

20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Summit has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Summit has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (20.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Ashland

20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Ashland has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Ashland has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (20.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.0%).
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (20.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Geauga

21.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 21.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (22.0%), Geauga has a value of 21.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Geauga has a value of 21.0%.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (21.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.0%).
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Ashland

48.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 48.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 48.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Ashland has a value of 48.0% which is lower and worse.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Ashland has a value of 48.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (48.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

49.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 49.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 49.0% which is lower and worse.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 49.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (49.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

57.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 57.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 57.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (57.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (55.0%).
Prior Value
(55.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Geauga

57.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Geauga has a value of 57.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Geauga has a value of 57.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (57.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Lake

54.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Lake has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Lake has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (54.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (56.0%).
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Lorain

55.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 55.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Lorain has a value of 55.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Lorain has a value of 55.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (55.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (54.0%).
Prior Value
(54.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Medina

58.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Medina has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Medina has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (58.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (56.0%).
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Portage

56.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 56.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 56.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Portage has a value of 56.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Portage has a value of 56.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (56.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (53.0%).
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Summit

58.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.3%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (53.0%), Summit has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(53.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Summit has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (58.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (56.0%).
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Hypertension: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Hypertension: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Lake

66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 66.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 66.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Lake has a value of 66.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Lake has a value of 66.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (66.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Lorain

70.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 70.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 70.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Lorain has a value of 70.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Lorain has a value of 70.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (70.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.0%).
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Medina

66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 66.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 66.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Medina has a value of 66.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Medina has a value of 66.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (66.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Portage

67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 67.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 67.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Portage has a value of 67.0%.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Portage has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (67.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Summit

65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Summit has a value of 65.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Summit has a value of 65.0%.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (65.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Ashland

69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 69.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 69.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Ashland has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Ashland has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (69.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.0%).
Prior Value
(69.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 68.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 68.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (68.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (69.0%).
Prior Value
(69.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 66.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 66.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 66.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 66.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (66.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Geauga

63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 63.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 69.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 63.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (67.0%), Geauga has a value of 63.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(67.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Geauga has a value of 63.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (63.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (63.0%).
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Ashland

65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 65.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Ashland has a value of 65.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Ashland has a value of 65.0%.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (65.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (64.0%).
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 67.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 67.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (67.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.0%).
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 64.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (63.0%).
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Geauga

65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 65.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Geauga has a value of 65.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Geauga has a value of 65.0%.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (65.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (63.0%).
Prior Value
(63.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Lake

69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Lake has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Lake has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (69.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (67.0%).
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Lorain

69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Lorain has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Lorain has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (69.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (67.0%).
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Medina

67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 67.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 67.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Medina has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Medina has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (67.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Portage

68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Portage has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Portage has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (68.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Summit

68.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 68.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (66.0%), Summit has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Summit has a value of 68.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (68.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Ashland

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Ashland has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Ashland has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 12.0%.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Geauga

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Geauga has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Geauga has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Lake

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Lake has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Lorain

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Lorain has a value of 12.0%.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lorain has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Medina

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Medina has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Medina has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Portage

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Portage has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Portage has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Summit

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Summit has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Summit has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (11.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Ashland

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Ashland has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Ashland has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (26.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (26.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Geauga

19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Geauga has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Geauga has a value of 19.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Lake

24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Lake has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Lake has a value of 24.0%.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Lorain

25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Lorain has a value of 25.0%.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Lorain has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (25.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Medina

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Medina has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Medina has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Portage

24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Portage has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Portage has a value of 24.0%.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Summit

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (25.0%), Summit has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Summit has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (23.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Depression: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Depression: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Ashland

17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Ashland has a value of 17.0%.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Ashland has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (16.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Geauga

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Geauga has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Geauga has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (16.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Lake

17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Lake has a value of 17.0%.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Lake has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (17.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Lorain

18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Lorain has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Lorain has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (18.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Medina

17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Medina has a value of 17.0%.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Medina has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (17.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Portage

19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Portage has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Portage has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Depression: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Summit

20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (17.0%), Summit has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Summit has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (20.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

COPD: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

COPD: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Cuyahoga

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Cuyahoga has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Cuyahoga has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Cuyahoga (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Cuyahoga value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population County: Geauga

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Geauga

11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Geauga has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Geauga has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Geauga has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Geauga has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Geauga (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Geauga value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population County: Lake

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Lake

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lake has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Lake has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lake has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lake (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lake value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population County: Lorain

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Lorain

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Lorain has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Lorain has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Lorain has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Lorain has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Lorain (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Lorain value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population County: Medina

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Medina

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Medina has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Medina has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Medina has a value of 12.0%.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Medina has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Medina (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Medina value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population County: Portage

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Portage

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Portage has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Portage has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Portage has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Portage has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Portage (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Portage value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population County: Summit

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Summit

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Summit has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Summit has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Summit has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Summit has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Summit (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Summit value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Ashland

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Ashland has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Ashland has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

COPD: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (12.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (15.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Data updated 12/11/2023
Value
Compared to:

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Ashland

Current Value:

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Ashland

19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashland has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashland has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (18.0%), Ashland has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Ashland has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashland (19.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashland value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

Current Value:

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Ashtabula

17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Ashtabula has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (18.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
OH Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Ashtabula has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Ashtabula (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Ashtabula value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.